Accutane 70kg, Buy Accutane Yahoo @ Online Quick http://www.baseballrelated.com A 2004 baseball road trip, and everything that followed... Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:10:38 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 Wait, I’ve had this dream http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/04/wait-ive-had-this-dream/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/04/wait-ive-had-this-dream/#comments Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:10:38 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=879

Gwinnett Ballet Theater dancers in a promotion with the Gwinnett Braves. From the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

]]>

Gwinnett Ballet Theater dancers in a promotion with the Gwinnett Braves. From the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

]]>
http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/04/wait-ive-had-this-dream/feed/ 0
2012 predictions http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/2012-predictions/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/2012-predictions/#comments Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:26:49 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=878 First of all, I’d say the Cardinals have found their replacement for Albert Pujols!

I’m currently out of work, which would have allowed me to sit in front of the TV on Opening Day and live-tweet, as I did in some past years (even before Twitter was invented) — but instead, I’m going to be in [...]]]> First of all, I’d say the Cardinals have found their replacement for Albert Pujols!

Minor League Guy on third

I’m currently out of work, which would have allowed me to sit in front of the TV on Opening Day and live-tweet, as I did in some past years (even before Twitter was invented) — but instead, I’m going to be in Ireland, where there will probably not be any baseball on TV.

On to the predictions. Kansas City appears to be Sports Illustrated’s pick to be the surprising team of the year, but our cold equations still have them finishing last in the AL Central. They’re also obviously taking Pujols into account with their Angels prediction, but we’re not.

Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (95-67) 1. N.Y. Yankees (96-66)
2. Tampa Bay Rays (92-70) 2. Tampa Bay Rays (93-69)
3. Boston Red Sox (91-71) 3. Boston Red Sox (90-72)
4. Toronto Blue Jays (85-77) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (82-80)
5. Baltimore Orioles (63-99) 5. Baltimore Orioles (68-94)
AL Central
1. Detroit Tigers (93-69) 1. Detroit Tigers (90-72)
2. Kansas City Royals (82-80) 2. Chicago White Sox (82-80)
3. Cleveland Indians (80-82) 3. Cleveland Indians (76-86)
4. Minnesota Twins (72-90) 4. Minnesota Twins (73-89)
5. Chicago White Sox (67-95) 5. Kansas City Royals (70-92)
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (97-65) 1. Texas Rangers (94-68)
2. Texas Rangers (94-68) 2. L.A. Angels (84-78)
3. Oakland Athletics (68-94) 3. Oakland Athletics (76-86)
4. Seattle Mariners (64-98) 4. Seattle Mariners (65-97)
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (94-68) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (100-62)
2. Miami Marlins (89-73) 2. Atlanta Braves (90-72)
3. Washington Nationals (84-78) 3. N.Y. Mets (78-84)
4. Atlanta Braves (82-80) 4. Washington Nationals (76-86)
5. N.Y. Mets (75-87) 5. Miami Marlins (75-87)
NL Central
1. Cincinnati Reds (89-73) 1. Milwaukee Brewers (90-72)
2. St. Louis Cardinals (87-75) 2. St. Louis Cardinals (89-73)
3. Milwaukee Brewers (84-78) 3. Cincinnati Reds (83-79)
4. Pittsburgh Pirates (70-92) 4. Chicago Cubs (72-90)
5. Chicago Cubs (66-96) 5. Pittsburgh Pirates (67-95)
6. Houston Astros (57-105) 6. Houston Astros (63-99)
NL West
1. San Francisco Giants (90-72) 1. San Francisco Giants (88-74)
2. Arizona Diamondbacks (88-74) 2. Arizona Diamondbacks (84-78)
3. L.A. Dodgers (83-79) 3. L.A. Dodgers (81-81)
4. Colorado Rockies (79-83) 4. San Diego Padres (77-85)
5. San Diego Padres (70-92) 5. Colorado Rockies (76-86)
]]> http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/2012-predictions/feed/ 0
The 2011 predictions in review http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/the-2011-predictions-in-review/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/the-2011-predictions-in-review/#comments Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:52:42 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=877 And here’s what has become the entire raison d’ĂȘtre of this site’s existence, in which we compare the Sports Illustrated projections and our own mathematical formula projections with the actual results.

As you can see, neither we nor SI predicted the Diamondbacks doing as well as they did, nor the Twins doing so poorly. Please note [...]]]> And here’s what has become the entire raison d’ĂȘtre of this site’s existence, in which we compare the Sports Illustrated projections and our own mathematical formula projections with the actual results.

As you can see, neither we nor SI predicted the Diamondbacks doing as well as they did, nor the Twins doing so poorly. Please note that we got the standings order of the AL East and the AL West correct, unlike SI.

Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com Actual Results
AL East
1. Boston Red Sox (100-62) 1. N.Y. Yankees (98-64) 1. N.Y. Yankees (97-65)
2. N.Y. Yankees (92-70) 2. Tampa Bay Rays (92-70) 2. Tampa Bay Rays (91-71)
3. Tampa Bay Rays (84-78) 3. Boston Red Sox (91-71) 3. Boston Red Sox (90-72)
4. Baltimore Orioles (78-84) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (82-80) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (81-81)
5. Toronto Blue Jays (77-85) 5. Baltimore Orioles (65-97) 5. Baltimore Orioles (69-93)
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (90-72) 1. Minnesota Twins (92-70) 1. Detroit Tigers (95-67)
2. Detroit Tigers (89-73) 2. Chicago White Sox (85-77) 2. Cleveland Indians (80-82)
3. Chicago White Sox (84-78) 3. Detroit Tigers (83-79) 3. Chicago White Sox (79-83)
4. Cleveland Indians (70-92) 4. Cleveland Indians (68-94) 4. Kansas City Royals (71-91)
5. Kansas City Royals (67-95) 5. Kansas City Royals (66-96) 5. Minnesota Twins (63-99)
AL West
1. Oakland Athletics (87-75) 1. Texas Rangers (89-73) 1. Texas Rangers (96-66)
2. Texas Rangers (85-77) 2. L.A. Angels (86-76) 2. L.A. Angels (86-76)
3. L.A. Angels (77-85) 3. Oakland Athletics (79-83) 3. Oakland Athletics (74-88)
4. Seattle Mariners (63-99) 4. Seattle Mariners (69-93) 4. Seattle Mariners (67-95)
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (93-69) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (96-66) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (102-60)
2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) 2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) 2. Atlanta Braves (80-81)
3. Florida Marlins (85-77) 3. Florida Marlins (82-80) 3. Washington Nationals (80-81)
4. Washington Nationals (75-87) 4. N.Y. Mets (76-86) 4. N.Y. Mets (77-85)
5. N.Y. Mets (74-88) 5. Washington Nationals (66-96) 5. Florida Marlins (72-90)
NL Central
1. Cincinnati Reds (89-73) 1. St. Louis Cardinals (88-74) 1. Milwaukee Brewers (96-66)
2. Milwaukee Brewers (84-78) 2. Cincinnati Reds (87-75) 2. St. Louis Cardinals (90-72)
3. Chicago Cubs (81-81) 3. Chicago Cubs (78-84) 3. Cincinnati Reds (79-83)
4. St. Louis Cardinals (78-84) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (78-84) 4. Pittsburgh Pirates (72-90)
5. Pittsburgh Pirates (65-97) 5. Houston Astros (75-87) 5. Chicago Cubs (71-91)
6. Houston Astros (64-98) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (59-103) 6. Houston Astros (56-106)
NL West
1. San Francisco Giants (91-71) 1. San Francisco Giants (91-71) 1. Arizona Diamondbacks (94-68)
2. Colorado Rockies (90-72) 2. Colorado Rockies (86-76) 2. San Francisco Giants (86-76)
3. L.A. Dodgers (82-80) 3. L.A. Dodgers (85-77) 3. L.A. Dodgers (82-79)
4. San Diego Padres (76-86) 3. San Diego Padres (85-77) 4. Colorado Rockies (73-89)
5. Arizona Diamondbacks (71-91) 5. Arizona Diamondbacks (67-95) 5. San Diego Padres (71-91)
]]> http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/the-2011-predictions-in-review/feed/ 0
Sales pitch http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/sales-pitch/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/sales-pitch/#comments Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:46:10 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=875 I got a phone call today from the Angels selling season ticket plans. Despite the single-game tickets I’ve bought over the last decade-plus, this is the first time I’ve ever been called by a salesperson from any team — never the Angels previously, not the Dodgers, not any of the teams we’ve seen on the [...]]]> I got a phone call today from the Angels selling season ticket plans. Despite the single-game tickets I’ve bought over the last decade-plus, this is the first time I’ve ever been called by a salesperson from any team — never the Angels previously, not the Dodgers, not any of the teams we’ve seen on the road trips.

My guess is that the Angels hired some extra people in the ticket department due to Pujols, and now to give them all something to do, they’re going further down the lead sheet than they would have in the past. Fortunately, I got the salesperson off the phone quickly when I said I’d just lost my job — no, wait, I guess that was unfortunate, right?

Anyway, Levi might be happy to know that Pujols didn’t come up during the brief conversation, so at least they’re not leading with him.

]]>
http://www.baseballrelated.com/2012/03/sales-pitch/feed/ 0
Cardinals championship ruins joke http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/10/cardinals-championship-ruins-joke/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/10/cardinals-championship-ruins-joke/#comments Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:02:55 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=873 In 1996, I sent Levi a condolence card after the National League Championship Series, in which the Braves came back from being down 3 games to 1 to the Cardinals (including a 14-0 win at Busch Stadium in Game 5).

In 2004, I sent Levi a condolence card after the Red Sox swept the Cardinals in [...]]]> In 1996, I sent Levi a condolence card after the National League Championship Series, in which the Braves came back from being down 3 games to 1 to the Cardinals (including a 14-0 win at Busch Stadium in Game 5).

In 2004, I sent Levi a condolence card after the Red Sox swept the Cardinals in the World Series.

This year, if the Rangers had won in Game 6 or Game 7, what I would have sent Levi is some random sort of greeting card — perhaps a My Little Pony birthday card that would normally be intended for a 5-year-old girl — and writing in it, “I asked my friend Tony La Russa to call and order a condolence card.”

Of course, I don’t think Levi necessarily minds that he didn’t get to fully enjoy that joke.

]]> http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/10/cardinals-championship-ruins-joke/feed/ 0
Moneyball http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/09/moneyball/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/09/moneyball/#comments Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:59:37 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=872 You’ve got to like a baseball movie that can, at the most crucial situation depicted in the film, have the audience hoping for a walk.

Not to mention any movie in which the very first image depicted on screen is that of Johnny Damon. (Unfortunately, he’s only in the movie via archive footage and as a [...]]]> You’ve got to like a baseball movie that can, at the most crucial situation depicted in the film, have the audience hoping for a walk.

Not to mention any movie in which the very first image depicted on screen is that of Johnny Damon. (Unfortunately, he’s only in the movie via archive footage and as a topic of conversation, so we don’t know who would have played him. Instead, we know Stephen Bishop as David Justice and Chris Pratt as catcher-turned-first-baseman Scott Hatteberg.)

Jonah Hill seems particularly good — or maybe it’s just surprising to see him acting dramatic in a drama. Of course, the only reason he’s in this movie is because Paul DePodesta and his Harvard economics degree wouldn’t sign off on the use of his name and likeness, so instead they created a completely different character: one with an economics degree from Yale. (Wikipedia claims that Paul DePodesta would have been played by Demetri Martin, who you may note has a slightly different body type than Jonah Hill.)

Since I remember 2002 fairly well, I was of course on the lookout for anachronisms, and the only one I remember seeing was the current logo of KICU being used, although I’m sure there were some uniform details that were wrong, and they’ll probably get brought up soon on Uni Watch. (Something that did correctly make it in to the movie was the ad on the outfield wall at the Coliseum for “Fox Sports Net/Cable Channel 40.”) I also heard a huge anachronism, but I’ll leave that out of this post to avoid spoiling it for future nitpickers.

A very good baseball movie, and it also has plenty of Brad Pitt displaying emotion for people who don’t like baseball. If you don’t like either of those things, well, too bad for you.

]]> http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/09/moneyball/feed/ 0
2011 predictions http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/2011-predictions/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/2011-predictions/#comments Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:33:13 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=868 Oh, it’s this thing again. The Sports Illustrated picks, and our ridiculous mathematical picks. SI didn’t include a Player to Watch feature this year, which is good, because it means I don’t have to write 30 stupid jokes about baseball players’ names.

Actually, I do have one legitimate Player to Watch: Evan Longoria, now that we [...]]]> Oh, it’s this thing again. The Sports Illustrated picks, and our ridiculous mathematical picks. SI didn’t include a Player to Watch feature this year, which is good, because it means I don’t have to write 30 stupid jokes about baseball players’ names.

Actually, I do have one legitimate Player to Watch: Evan Longoria, now that we know he is an enthusiastic gun enthusiast, enough that he brought an AK-47 to spring training. Seriously, watch him. Watch out for him.

Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com
AL East
1. Boston Red Sox (100-62) 1. N.Y. Yankees (98-64)
2. N.Y. Yankees (92-70) 2. Tampa Bay Rays (92-70)
3. Tampa Bay Rays (84-78) 3. Boston Red Sox (91-71)
4. Baltimore Orioles (78-84) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (82-80)
5. Toronto Blue Jays (77-85) 5. Baltimore Orioles (65-97)
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (90-72) 1. Minnesota Twins (92-70)
2. Detroit Tigers (89-73) 2. Chicago White Sox (85-77)
3. Chicago White Sox (84-78) 3. Detroit Tigers (83-79)
4. Cleveland Indians (70-92) 4. Cleveland Indians (68-94)
5. Kansas City Royals (67-95) 5. Kansas City Royals (66-96)
AL West
1. Oakland Athletics (87-75) 1. Texas Rangers (89-73)
2. Texas Rangers (85-77) 2. L.A. Angels (86-76)
3. L.A. Angels (77-85) 3. Oakland Athletics (79-83)
4. Seattle Mariners (63-99) 4. Seattle Mariners (69-93)
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (93-69) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (96-66)
2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) 2. Atlanta Braves (89-73)
3. Florida Marlins (85-77) 3. Florida Marlins (82-80)
4. Washington Nationals (75-87) 4. N.Y. Mets (76-86)
5. N.Y. Mets (74-88) 5. Washington Nationals (66-96)
NL Central
1. Cincinnati Reds (89-73) 1. St. Louis Cardinals (88-74)
2. Milwaukee Brewers (84-78) 2. Cincinnati Reds (87-75)
3. Chicago Cubs (81-81) 3. Chicago Cubs (78-84)
4. St. Louis Cardinals (78-84) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (78-84)
5. Pittsburgh Pirates (65-97) 5. Houston Astros (75-87)
6. Houston Astros (64-98) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (59-103)
NL West
1. San Francisco Giants (91-71) 1. San Francisco Giants (91-71)
2. Colorado Rockies (90-72) 2. Colorado Rockies (86-76)
3. L.A. Dodgers (82-80) 3. L.A. Dodgers (85-77)
4. San Diego Padres (76-86) 3. San Diego Padres (85-77)
5. Arizona Diamondbacks (71-91) 5. Arizona Diamondbacks (67-95)
]]> http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/2011-predictions/feed/ 1
The Sweeney story http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/the-sweeney-story/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/the-sweeney-story/#comments Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:25:10 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=866 Mike Sweeney: player for a small-market team, and victim of a conspiracy that’s kept him from being recognized.

]]>
Mike Sweeney: player for a small-market team, and victim of a conspiracy that’s kept him from being recognized.

]]>
http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/the-sweeney-story/feed/ 0
The 2010 predictions in review http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/the-2010-predictions-in-review/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/the-2010-predictions-in-review/#comments Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:24:11 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=865 Once again, it’s time to look back and see how two entities did with their predictions for the 2010 season: Sports Illustrated, with their decades of baseball expertise, and this website, with a simple formula I have from an old Bill James Abstract and a deep desire to make fun of baseball players’ names.

In the [...]]]> Once again, it’s time to look back and see how two entities did with their predictions for the 2010 season: Sports Illustrated, with their decades of baseball expertise, and this website, with a simple formula I have from an old Bill James Abstract and a deep desire to make fun of baseball players’ names.

In the “actual results” columns, for the most part, the “Player Who Should Have Been Watched” was the team’s leader in the Runs Above Replacement Player statistic — which I only vaguely understand, but fortunately, there are websites aplenty that don’t make you understand it, they just print the results. In a few cases, though, it seemed obvious that someone else (or something else) should have gotten all the scrutiny.

Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com Actual results
Prediction Player to Watch Prediction Player to Watch Prediction Player Who Should Have Been Watched
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (100-62) Javier Vazquez (RHP) 1. N.Y. Yankees (98-64) Derek Jeter (SS) 1. Tampa Bay Rays (96-66) Evan Longoria (3B)
2. Tampa Bay Rays (95-67) Jeff Niemann (RHP) 2. Boston Red Sox (95-67) Kevin Youkilis (1B) 2. New York Yankees (95-67) Robinson Cano (2B)
3. Boston Red Sox (93-69) Mike Cameron (CF) 3. Tampa Bay Rays (88-74) Pansy the Wuss-Wuss Fish Who Can’t Keep It Up (mascot) 3. Boston Red Sox (89-73) Adrian Beltre (3B)
4. Baltimore Orioles (76-86) Nick Markakis (RF) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (79-83) Marc Rzepczynski (LHP) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (85-77) Jose Bautista (RF)
5. Toronto Blue Jays (64-98) Ricky Romero (LHP) 5. Baltimore Orioles (65-97) Cesar Izturis (SS) 5. Baltimore Orioles (66-96) Luke Scott (1B)
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (88-74) Orlando Hudson (2B) 1. Minnesota Twins (87-75) The Minnesota Weather (environment) 1. Minnesota Twins (94-68) Joe Mauer (DH)
2. Detroit Tigers (82-80) Johnny Damon (LF) 2. Chicago White Sox (82-80) Gordon Beckham (2B) 2. Chicago White Sox (88-64) Paul Konerko (1B)
3. Chicago White Sox (79-83) Jake Peavy (RHP) 3. Detroit Tigers (82-80) Johnny Damon (LF) 3. Detroit Tigers (81-81) Armando Galarraga (RHP) — should have been watched a little more carefully by Jim Joyce.
4. Cleveland Indians (66-96) Fausto Carmona (RHP) 4. Cleveland Indians (70-92) Fausto Carmona (RHP) 4. Cleveland Indians (69-93) Shin-Soo Choo (RF)
5. Kansas City Royals (65-97) Zack Greinke (RHP) 5. Kansas City Royals (68-94) Zack Greinke (RHP) 5. Kansas City Royals (67-95) Royals Hall of Fame at Kaufmann Stadium (exhibit)
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (89-73) Ervin Santana (RHP) 1. L.A. Angels (98-64) Jered Weaver (RHP) 1. Texas Rangers (90-72) Josh Hamilton (RF)
2. Texas Rangers (87-75) Josh Hamilton (RF) 2. Texas Rangers (84-78) Jarrod Saltalamacchia (C) 2. Oakland Athletics (81-81) Dallas Braden (LHP) — should have been watched by more than 12,228 on May 9th.
3. Seattle Mariners (83-79) Milton Bradley (LF) 3. Seattle Mariners (77-85) David Aardsma (RHP) 3. L.A. Angels (80-82) Kendry Morales (1B) — should have been watched more carefully to make sure he doesn’t break his leg jumping onto the plate after hitting a home run.
4. Oakland Athletics (79-83) Ben Sheets (RHP) 4. Oakland Athletics (75-87) Coco Crisp (CF) 4. Seattle Mariners (61-101) Ichiro Suzuki (RF)
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (100-62) Cole Hamels (LHP) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (93-69) Placido Polanco (3B) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (97-65) Roy Halladay (RHP) — should have been watched in case he threw a perfect game in the regular season and a no-hitter in the postseason.
2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) Billy Wagner (LHP) 2. Florida Marlins (86-76) John Baker (C) 2. Atlanta Braves (91-71) Brian McCann (C)
3. Florida Marlins (82-80) Ricky Nolasco (RHP) 3. Atlanta Braves (81-81) Jair Jurrjens (RHP) 3. Florida Marlins (80-82) Dan Uggla (2B)
4. N.Y. Mets (79-83) Daniel Murphy (1B) 4. N.Y. Mets (76-86) Angel Pagan (OF) 4. N.Y. Mets (79-83) Angel Pagan (OF)
5. Washington Nationals (67-95) Nyjer Morgan (CF) 5. Washington Nationals (59-103) Nyjer Morgan (CF) 5. Washington Nationals (69-93) Stephen Strasburg (RHP) — okay, no “should have been” here; was watched, by everyone, everywhere.
NL Central
1. St. Louis Cardinals (87-75) Colby Rasmus (CF) 1. St. Louis Cardinals (89-73) Albert Pujols (1B) 1. Cincinnati Reds (91-71) Joey Votto (1B)
2. Chicago Cubs (81-81) Geovany Soto (C) 2. Chicago Cubs (88-74) Carlos Zambrano (RHP) 2. St. Louis Cardinals (86-76) Albert Pujols (1B)
3. Cincinnati Reds (79-83) Homer Bailey (RHP) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (83-79) Trevor Hoffman (RHP) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (77-85) Rickie Weeks (2B)
4. Milwaukee Brewers (77-85) Alcides Escobar (SS) 4. Houston Astros (78-84) Roy Oswalt (RHP) 4. Houston Astros (76-86) Michael Bourn (OF)
5. Houston Astros (69-93) Brett Myers (RHP) 5. Cincinnati Reds (77-85) Homer Bailey (RHP) 5. Chicago Cubs (75-87) Marlon Byrd (OF)
6. Pittsburgh Pirates (65-97) Andrew McCutchen (CF) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (64-98) The Primanti Sandwich (concession) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (57-105) The Pittsburgh Skyline As Seen from PNC Park (view)
NL West
1. Colorado Rockies (91-71) Todd Helton (1B) 1. L.A. Dodgers (91-71) Manny Ramirez (LF) 1. San Francisco Giants (92-70) Brian Wilson (RHP) — should have been watched for beard-related shoe-polish purchases.
2. L.A. Dodgers (87-75) Chad Billingsley (RHP) 2. Colorado Rockies (86-76) Huston Street (RHP) 2. San Diego Padres (90-72) Adrian Gonzalez (1B)
3. San Francisco Giants (83-79) Brian Wilson (RHP) 3. San Francisco Giants (83-79) Barry Zito (LHP) 3. Colorado Rockies (83-79) Troy Tulowitzki (SS)
4. Arizona Diamondbacks (82-80) Mark Reynolds (3B) 4. Arizona Diamondbacks (74-88) Augie Ojeda (IF) 4. L.A. Dodgers (80-82) McCourt vs. McCourt (trial)
5. San Diego Padres (66-96) Kyle Blanks (LF) 5. San Diego Padres (71-91) Will Venable (RF) 5. Arizona Diamondbacks (65-97) Justin Upton (RF)
]]> http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/the-2010-predictions-in-review/feed/ 1
“What baseball team should I root for?” http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/what-baseball-team-should-i-root-for/ http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/what-baseball-team-should-i-root-for/#comments Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:49:27 +0000 Jim Ellwanger http://www.baseballrelated.com/?p=863 A flowchart.

]]>
A flowchart.

]]>
http://www.baseballrelated.com/2011/03/what-baseball-team-should-i-root-for/feed/ 0